Cold Chain Excursion
A refrigerated shipment arrives with a temperature excursion on the logger. Decide what happens to the stock, who makes the call, and what the answer rests on — before a customer asks where their order is.
What a scenario is not
A scenario is a judgment exercise, not an assessment and not a compliance verdict. Finishing it evidences that you worked through it — nothing more — and the dimensions it scores are SPEQ’s, not any regulator’s.
A delivery of medicine got too warm on the way. You decide whether it can still be used, who decides, and what you have to be able to show afterwards.
Good Distribution Practice requires storage and transport within authorised conditions, with excursions assessed against stability data rather than against the label alone, and disposition decided by a named responsible person on documented evidence.
Distribution is where a correctly made batch is most easily lost and least easily seen. The excursion decision is a scientific judgement made under commercial pressure, and the pressure is always in the same direction.
You are the distribution quality specialist at a wholesale site. A pallet of a 2–8 °C product has arrived; the logger shows 14 °C for eleven hours.
The customer is calling. Each decision changes what you can still do.
The driver is waiting and the warehouse wants the pallet put away. The logger data has been downloaded but not reviewed.
This is a judgment exercise, not a quiz: your choices change the situation. It is scored across assessment · control · evidence · governance — the same dimensions an inspector effectively weighs when they follow the thread of a real deviation. There is no compliance verdict here; the debriefs explain consequences.
Finishing this exercise is recorded. What it evidences — and the things it does not — is set out against the published standard.
What this evidences →