PLANREFERENCE OUTLINE

GLP Monitoring Inspection Readiness Plan

Readiness plan for a compliance monitoring inspection, where the outcome is your standing in a system other countries rely on rather than one client confidence. Covers the authority and the scope actually inspected, master-schedule currency, a self-audit on a study that could fail, demonstrating the facility rather than paperwork about it, quality-assurance record consistency, and answering findings with cause, correction and prevention. Maps to the OECD GLP Principles and Directive 2004/10/EC.

What a template is not

A template is a document baseline to adapt inside your own quality system. SPEQ does not approve, validate, or take responsibility for what you issue from it, and using one is not evidence of compliance.

CHECKING ACCESS

Checking your Professional access…

REGULATIONS MAPPED
OECD GLP PrinciplesDirective 2004/10/EC
DOCUMENT TYPE
Plan
LAST UPDATED
August 2026
PURPOSE

Good laboratory practice is enforced through national compliance monitoring programmes, and mutual acceptance of data between countries depends on those programmes recognising each other. The outcome of an inspection is therefore your standing in a system other countries rely on, not one client’s confidence. The scope you claim compliance for travels internationally with your data, and deciding what that scope is remains your determination.

What's Inside

The monitoring authority, the study types actually inspected, and an explicit statement of what sits outside that scope
Master schedule currency checks, because it is the first request and the worst thing to fumble
A self-selected study audit run on a study that could fail rather than on a tidy one
Facility demonstration checklist including a live archive retrieval performed against a real study number
Quality assurance record completeness, checked for consistency against the study records they refer to
Personnel readiness — who answers what, and who is authorised to say the facility does not know
A findings response format requiring cause, correction and prevention rather than explanation

How to Use It

1Claim compliance only for the study types the authority actually inspected — a claim beyond the assessed scope travels internationally with the data.
2Reconcile the master schedule against live studies before anything else; a schedule missing a study reads as a study nobody was tracking.
3Choose a study that could fail for the self-audit, because a tidy one cannot fail and therefore teaches you nothing.
4Rehearse a live archive retrieval against a real study number; retrieval that works on a familiar record proves nothing about the archive.
5Check quality assurance records against the study records they refer to, so an inspector does not find the inconsistency first.
6Answer every finding with cause, correction and prevention — an explanation of why the finding is understandable is not a response.
DOCUMENT CONTENTS

The full section structure of this template — every section and sub-section, so you can use it as a baseline for your own site document.

Document Control
Document InformationApproval SignaturesRevision HistoryDistribution List
1Authority, Scope and What Is at Stake
2Master Schedule Currency
3Self-Selected Study Audit
4Demonstrating the Facility
5Quality Assurance Records
6Responding to Findings
REGULATORY CONTEXT

The OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice set the requirements a test facility operates under, and Directive 2004/10/EC establishes the national compliance monitoring programmes through which those principles are inspected and on which mutual acceptance of data depends. Neither prescribes how a facility prepares, which study it audits itself, or how it rehearses an archive retrieval. Those choices belong to the facility. The readiness structure and the self-audit approach here are SPEQ practitioner synthesis.

MAPPED STANDARDS
OECD GLP PrinciplesDirective 2004/10/EC
Browse the standards catalog →