HPLC and chromatography data system
HPLC · UHPLC · Liquid chromatograph · Chromatography data system (CDS)
The chromatograph that separates and measures a sample, and the data system that acquires, processes and stores the results a batch is released on.
What this page does not claim
An equipment family page teaches how a kind of equipment works and how it is assured. It is not a qualification of any site’s equipment, sets no universal limits, and was checked by SPEQ against the sources it lists, not by an independent engineer.
WHAT IT DOES
A high-performance liquid chromatograph pumps a mobile phase through a column, separates the sample’s components and measures them with a detector; the chromatography data system (CDS) controls the instrument, integrates peaks and calculates results. Most assay, impurity and identity results for release come from such a system.
The instrument is qualified as laboratory equipment and the CDS validated as a computerised system: Annex 11 asks for risk-based validation, audit trails of GMP-relevant changes and deletions that are "regularly reviewed", controlled access, and data secured and backed up throughout retention (1, 4, 7, 9, 12).
Where it sits: In the quality control laboratory, and in development and in-process testing.
WHERE YOU FIND IT
- Assay and impurity testing for release and stability
- Identity testing
- Cleaning validation residue analysis
In the reference facility: QC analytical laboratory
Not covered on this page: Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, which share most of the data controls; Method development and validation themselves.
MAJOR COMPONENTS
- Pump and mobile phase delivery. Delivers flow and gradient.
- Autosampler. Injects samples in sequence.
- Column and column oven. Separates components at controlled temperature.
- Detector (UV, diode array, fluorescence or other). Measures the separated components.
- Chromatography data system. Controls acquisition, processing, reporting, audit trails and storage.
Connects to: Laboratory information management system (LIMS); Network storage and backup; Balances (sample weights); Reference standards.
INSTRUMENTS AND WHAT THEY MEASURE
- Chromatography performance checks. Module performance in qualification and system suitability before each run. Watch for: system suitability passed by reprocessing until it fits.
- Temperature sensor (RTD or thermocouple). Column oven and autosampler temperature. Watch for: sensor not at the location that matters (cold spot, load centre).
PARAMETERS
SETPOINT · MEASURED · LIMIT · ATTRIBUTE- System suitability result (limit, resolution or % RSD or tailing factor). Criteria defined in the validated analytical procedure for the product.
- Temperature (setpoint, °C). Column temperature, as the analytical procedure sets it.
- Audit trail record (attribute, entries per change: who, what, when, why). Generated for GMP-relevant changes and deletions with reasons, and reviewed regularly (Annex 11, 9).
SPEQ publishes no universal alarm or acceptance values: they depend on the process, the product and the site’s own qualification.
CONTROLS, ALARMS AND INTERLOCKS
- Procedure: Audit trail review. Regular review of GMP-relevant changes and deletions, with reasons documented (Annex 11, 9).
- Interlock: Role-based access. Restricts acquisition, processing and method changes to authorised users; access changes are recorded (Annex 11, 12).
- Procedure: Backup and restore. Regular backups, with restore checked in validation and periodically (Annex 11, 7.2).
- Procedure: Periodic evaluation. Confirms the system remains in a validated state (Annex 11, 11).
- Procedure: Trending of results. Critical results trended and checked for consistency; out-of-trend and out-of-specification data investigated (Chapter 6, 6.9, 6.16).
An alarm asks for a response; an interlock stops an action; a safety function protects people and has its own risk basis.
HOW IT FAILS
- Manual reintegration without justification. Results changed toward a pass.
- Trial or unreported injections. Testing into compliance.
- Shared logins. Actions cannot be attributed to a person (Annex 11, 12.4).
- Data on local drives without backup. Original data lost.
- Pump or detector drift. Inaccurate results not caught when system suitability is weak.
ASSURANCE ACROSS THE LIFECYCLE
EXAMPLES, NOT A MANDATORY LIST- Instrument qualification. Installation and operational qualification of each module; Performance checks at defined intervals.
- CDS validation (Annex 11, 4). User requirements and risk assessment; Configuration of audit trails, access and calculations; Data migration checks where data are moved (4.8).
- Method validation. Validated or verified analytical procedure (Chapter 6, 6.15).
- Routine. System suitability per run; Audit trail review before results are approved; Records with the data Chapter 6 requires (6.17).
- Periodic. Periodic evaluation and access review (Annex 11, 11, 12.3).
WHAT THIS DOES NOT PROVE
- A passing system suitability does not prove the result was not reprocessed. Instead: Audit trail review of the injection and processing history.
- A validated CDS does not prove each result is genuine. Instead: Review of audit trails, sequences and all injections against the reported result.
- A qualified instrument does not prove the method is suitable for the product. Instead: Method validation or verification (Chapter 6, 6.15).
SOURCES
2 CITED- EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems — European Commission (EudraLex Volume 4), 2011, in operation 30 June 2011 (revised draft consulted from 7 July 2025, not in force). European Union; in force. Supports: Risk management (1); validation (4); data storage and backups (7); audit trails (9); change management (10); periodic evaluation (11); security and access (12).
- EU GMP Part I, Chapter 6: Quality Control — European Commission (EudraLex Volume 4), 28 March 2014, in operation 1 October 2014. European Union; in force. Supports: Laboratory equipment (6.5, 6.6); trending (6.9, 6.16); method validation and verification (6.15); records (6.17).
HOW THIS PAGE WAS CHECKED
Researched and checked against the sources above by SPEQ (Claude) on 2026-10-21. It has not been reviewed by an independent engineer. It teaches how this kind of equipment works and is assured; it does not say any site, asset or process is qualified, validated or compliant.
- USP <1058> and <621> are not yet cited; they were not checked here.
- The 2025 Annex 11 draft is not in force and is not used for requirements here.
Spotted something wrong? Tell us.