FDA PRODUCT CODE · CLASS II

QHQ — Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System

To treat pain and lack of function in the shoulder.

What these counts are not

Clearance and recall counts are SPEQ’s aggregation of FDA’s own published records for the code. A recall count is a measure of history, not of a device’s safety, neither number is an FDA rating, and SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA.

DEVICE CLASS
Class II
REGULATION
21 CFR 888.3660
MEDICAL SPECIALTY
Orthopedic
REVIEW PANEL
OR
✓ Implant— Life-sustaining— GMP-exempt— Third-party review eligible
0
510(K)/PMA CLEARANCES
0
RECALL ENTRIES

What this classification requires

Every statement below is FDA’s own classification record for this product code, quoted from the device classification field reference. The SPEQ reading beneath each one is SPEQ’s interpretation of what it means for the work, and is not FDA text.

PREMARKET PATHWAY

510(K)

SPEQ READINGA premarket notification under 21 CFR Part 807 Subpart E is the route for this code. The submission argues substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate, so the engineering question is which predicate the design can actually be compared against, and the evidence question is what testing supports that comparison.

DEVICE CLASS

Class II (moderate to high risk): general controls and special controls

SPEQ READINGSpecial controls are the distinguishing feature: performance standards, guidance documents, patient registries or postmarket surveillance named for the device type. Find the special controls before designing the test plan — they usually name the tests.

MALFUNCTION REPORTING

Device is not eligible for The Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program

SPEQ READINGIndividual malfunction reporting under 21 CFR Part 803 applies. The complaint-handling system has to produce a decision per event, not per period.

GMP / QUALITY SYSTEM

Not exempt due to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)/Quality System

SPEQ READINGThe full Quality Management System Regulation (21 CFR 820, incorporating ISO 13485:2016) applies, and is what an FDA inspection of this device will be conducted against.

IMPLANT

Device is implantable

SPEQ READINGImplant status raises the evidentiary bar on biocompatibility and on traceability from finished device back to material lot.

LIFE-SUSTAINING

Device is not used for life sustaining purposes

SPEQ READINGNo life-sustaining designation attaches to this code.

THIRD-PARTY REVIEW

Device is not a candidate for a third party review program

SPEQ READINGFDA reviews any premarket notification for this code directly.

Other product codes under 21 CFR 888.3660

One regulation usually governs several product codes. These share this code’s regulation, and therefore its classification basis.

21 CFR 888.3660 — Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis

The classification regulation for this product code, as published by the Office of the Federal Register. This is the regulation text itself — no SPEQ interpretation appears in it.

(a) Identification. A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).

(b) Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are: (1) FDA's: (i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ” (ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),” (iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,” (iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and (v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,” (2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO): (i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,” (ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,” (iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,” (iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,” (v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,” (vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and (vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and (3) American Society for Testing and Materials': (i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,” (ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,” (iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,” (iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,” (v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,” (vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,” (vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and (viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.” [52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 17148, Mar. 31, 2000]

Source: Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. 21 CFR is a work of the United States Government and is in the public domain. SPEQ read this section on October 22, 2026. CFR is amended continuously, so verify against the source before acting on it: read 21 CFR 888.3660 on eCFR →

Source: FDA device classification, 510(k)/PMA, and recall datasets. Recall entries count distinct FDA recall numbers, so one recall event affecting several products appears as several entries. Browse every product code SPEQ tracks →