FDA PRODUCT CODE · CLASS II

QFG — Alternate Controller Enabled Insulin Infusion Pump

An alternate controller enabled insulin infusion pump (ACE insulin pump) is a device intended for the infusion of insulin into a patient. The ACE insulin pump may include basal and bolus drug delivery at set or variable rates. ACE insulin pumps are designed to reliably and securely communicate with external devices, such as automated insulin dosing systems, to allow insulin delivery commands to be received, executed, and confirmed. ACE insulin pumps are intended to be used both alone and in conjunction with digitally connected medical devices for the purpose of insulin delivery.

What these counts are not

Clearance and recall counts are SPEQ’s aggregation of FDA’s own published records for the code. A recall count is a measure of history, not of a device’s safety, neither number is an FDA rating, and SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA.

DEVICE CLASS
Class II
REGULATION
21 CFR 880.5730
MEDICAL SPECIALTY
Clinical Chemistry
REVIEW PANEL
CH
— Implant— Life-sustaining— GMP-exempt— Third-party review eligible
10
510(K)/PMA CLEARANCES
510k: 10
5
RECALL ENTRIES

What this classification requires

Every statement below is FDA’s own classification record for this product code, quoted from the device classification field reference. The SPEQ reading beneath each one is SPEQ’s interpretation of what it means for the work, and is not FDA text.

PREMARKET PATHWAY

510(K)

SPEQ READINGA premarket notification under 21 CFR Part 807 Subpart E is the route for this code. The submission argues substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate, so the engineering question is which predicate the design can actually be compared against, and the evidence question is what testing supports that comparison.

DEVICE CLASS

Class II (moderate to high risk): general controls and special controls

SPEQ READINGSpecial controls are the distinguishing feature: performance standards, guidance documents, patient registries or postmarket surveillance named for the device type. Find the special controls before designing the test plan — they usually name the tests.

MALFUNCTION REPORTING

Device is not eligible for The Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program

SPEQ READINGIndividual malfunction reporting under 21 CFR Part 803 applies. The complaint-handling system has to produce a decision per event, not per period.

GMP / QUALITY SYSTEM

Not exempt due to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)/Quality System

SPEQ READINGThe full Quality Management System Regulation (21 CFR 820, incorporating ISO 13485:2016) applies, and is what an FDA inspection of this device will be conducted against.

IMPLANT

Device is not implantable

SPEQ READINGNo implant-specific expectations attach from the classification itself.

LIFE-SUSTAINING

Device is not used for life sustaining purposes

SPEQ READINGNo life-sustaining designation attaches to this code.

THIRD-PARTY REVIEW

Device is not a candidate for a third party review program

SPEQ READINGFDA reviews any premarket notification for this code directly.

21 CFR 880.5730 — Alternate controller enabled infusion pump

The classification regulation for this product code, as published by the Office of the Federal Register. This is the regulation text itself — no SPEQ interpretation appears in it.

(a) Identification. An alternate controller enabled infusion pump (ACE pump) is a device intended for the infusion of drugs into a patient. The ACE pump may include basal and bolus drug delivery at set or variable rates. ACE pumps are designed to reliably and securely communicate with external devices, such as automated drug dosing systems, to allow drug delivery commands to be received, executed, and confirmed. ACE pumps are intended to be used both alone and in conjunction with digitally connected medical devices for the purpose of drug delivery.

(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: (1) Design verification and validation must include the following: (i) Evidence demonstrating that device infusion delivery accuracy conforms to defined user needs and intended uses and is validated to support safe use under actual use conditions. (A) Design input requirements must include delivery accuracy specifications under reasonably foreseeable use conditions, including ambient temperature changes, pressure changes ( e.g., head-height, backpressure, atmospheric), and, as appropriate, different drug fluidic properties. (B) Test results must demonstrate that the device meets the design input requirements for delivery accuracy under use conditions for the programmable range of delivery rates and volumes. Testing shall be conducted with a statistically valid number of devices to account for variation between devices.

(ii) Validation testing results demonstrating the ability of the pump to detect relevant hazards associated with drug delivery and the route of administration ( e.g., occlusions, air in line, etc.) within a clinically relevant timeframe across the range of programmable drug delivery rates and volumes. Hazard detection must be appropriate for the intended use of the device and testing must validate appropriate performance under the conditions of use for the device.

(iii) Validation testing results demonstrating compatibility with drugs that may be used with the pump based on its labeling. Testing must include assessment of drug stability under reasonably foreseeable use conditions that may affect drug stability ( e.g., temperature, light exposure, or other factors as needed).

(iv) The device parts that directly or indirectly contact the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. This shall include chemical and particulate characterization on the final, finished, fluid contacting device components demonstrating that risk of harm from device-related residues is reasonably low.

(v) Evidence verifying and validating that the device is reliable over the ACE pump use life, as specified in the design file, in terms of all device functions and in terms of pump performance.

(vi) The device must be designed and tested for electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and radio frequency wireless safety and availability consistent with patient safety requirements in the intended use environment.

(vii) For any device that is capable of delivering more than one drug, the risk of cross-channeling drugs must be adequately mitigated.

(viii) For any devices intended for multiple patient use, testing must demonstrate validation of reprocessing procedures and include verification that the device meets all functional and performance requirements after reprocessing.

(2) Design verification and validation activities must include appropriate design inputs and design outputs that are essential for the proper functioning of the device that have been documented and include the following: (i) Risk control measures shall be implemented to address device system hazards and the design decisions related to how the risk control measures impact essential performance shall be documented.

(ii) A traceability analysis demonstrating that all hazards are adequately controlled and that all controls have been validated in the final device design.

(3) The device shall include validated interface specifications for digitally connected devices. These interface specifications shall, at a minimum, provide for the following: (i) Secure authentication (pairing) to external devices.

(ii) Secure, accurate, and reliable means of data transmission between the pump and connected devices.

(iii) Sharing of necessary state information between the pump and any digitally connected alternate controllers ( e.g., battery level, reservoir level, pump status, error conditions).

(iv) Ensuring that the pump continues to operate safely when data is received in a manner outside the bounds of the parameters specified.

(v) A detailed process and procedure for sharing the pump interface specification with digitally connected devices and for validating the correct implementation of that protocol.

(4) The device must include appropriate measures to ensure that safe therapy is maintained when communications with digitally connected alternate controller devices is interrupted, lost, or re-established after an interruption ( e.g., reverting to a pre-programmed, safe drug delivery rate). Validation testing results must demonstrate that critical events that occur during a loss of communications ( e.g., commands, device malfunctions, occlusions, etc.) are handled appropriately during and after the interruption.

(5) The device design must ensure that a record of critical events is stored and accessible for an adequate period to allow for auditing of communications between digitally connected devices and to facilitate the sharing of pertinent information with the responsible parties for those connected devices. Critical events to be stored by the system must, at a minimum, include: (i) A record of all drug delivery (ii) Commands issued to the pump and pump confirmations (iii) Device malfunctions (iv) Alarms and alerts and associated acknowledgements (v) Connectivity events ( e.g., establishment or loss of communications) (6) Design verification and validation must include results obtained through a human factors study that demonstrates that an intended user can safely use the device for its intended use.

(7) Device labeling must include the following: (i) A prominent statement identifying the drugs that are compatible with the device, including the identity and concentration of those drugs as appropriate.

(ii) A description of the minimum and maximum basal rates, minimum and maximum bolus volumes, and the increment size for basal and bolus delivery, or other similarly applicable information about drug delivery parameters.

(iii) A description of the pump accuracy at minimum, intermediate, and maximum bolus delivery volumes and the method(s) used to establish bolus delivery accuracy. For each bolus volume, pump accuracy shall be described in terms of the number of bolus doses measured to be within a given range as compared to the commanded volume. An acceptable accuracy description (depending on the drug delivered and bolus volume) may be provided as follows for each bolus volume tested, as applicable: Number of bolus doses with volume that is <25 percent, 25 percent to <75 percent, 75 percent to <95 percent, 95 percent to <105 percent, 105 percent to <125 percent, 125 percent to <175 percent, 175 to 250 percent, and >250 percent of the commanded amount.

(iv) A description of the pump accuracy at minimum, intermediate, and maximum basal delivery rates and the method(s) used to establish basal delivery accuracy. For each basal rate, pump accuracy shall be described in terms of the amount of drug delivered after the basal delivery was first commanded, without a warmup period, up to various time points. The information provided must include typical pump performance, as well as worst-case pump performance observed during testing in terms of both over-delivery and under-delivery. An acceptable accuracy description (depending on the drug delivered) may be provided as follows, as applicable: The total volume delivered 1 hour, 6 hours, and 12 hours after starting delivery for a typical pump tested, as well as for the pump that delivered the least and the pump that delivered the most at each time point.

(v) A description of delivery hazard alarm performance, as applicable. For occlusion alarms, performance shall be reported at minimum, intermediate, and maximum delivery rates and volumes. This description must include the specification for the longest time period that may elapse before an occlusion alarm is triggered under each delivery condition, as well as the typical results observed during performance testing of the pumps.

(vi) For wireless connection enabled devices, a description of the wireless quality of service required for proper use of the device.

(vii) For any infusion pumps intended for multiple patient reuse, instructions for safely reprocessing the device between uses. [87 FR 6424, Feb. 4, 2022]

Source: Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. 21 CFR is a work of the United States Government and is in the public domain. SPEQ read this section on October 22, 2026. CFR is amended continuously, so verify against the source before acting on it: read 21 CFR 880.5730 on eCFR →

Recent clearances

K260001Beta Bionics, Inc. · 510k2026-09-11
K261672Deka Research and Development · 510k2026-06-17
K253976Beta Bionics, Inc. · 510k2026-04-30
K253743Medtronic Minimed, Inc. · 510k2026-03-12
K253470Medtronic Minimed, Inc. · 510k2026-01-15
K253074Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. · 510k2025-11-06
K252770Beta Bionics, Inc. · 510k2025-09-29
K250792Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. · 510k2025-09-24

Recent recalls

Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.Open, Classified · 2026-10-05

Some MiniMed Flex insulin pumps were released with missing (i.e., devices with no result or abort test results are presumed to have failed) or failed verification test results in one or more of 9 functional tests. The unverified/failed pumps released to users potentially have one or more of the

Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.Open, Classified · 2025-11-05

Insulin pump includes a vibration motor that gives tactile feedback for any alerts, alarms, or malfunctions. Pump may exhibit false vibration motor failure due to a software issue causing Malfunction 12: "Pump cannot operate, the mobile app can no longer receive data from the pump. Insulin delivery

Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.Open, Classified · 2025-10-23

A software defect in versions 7.9.0.1 and 7.10.1 of the pump software for Tandem t:slim X2 and version 7.9.0.1 of the Tandem Mobi pump with Control-IQ+ technology that are paired with a G7 sensor may result in an unexpected automatic insulin correction bolus (autobolus ) which could result in hypogl

Insulet CorporationOpen, Classified · 2024-01-04

The bolus calculator is not recording the decimal point if it is the first value entered when changing a bolus dose. This may lead to an over-delivery of insulin to the user if the user does not recognize the error on the bolus calculator screen or the confirmation screen prior to starting the bolus

Insulet CorporationOpen, Classified · 2022-12-07

The firm has become aware of an issue with the Omnipod 5 Controller where the Controller charging port and charging cable are melting, deforming, or discoloring due to heat generated by increased resistance in the Controller port. The excess heat may cause minor burns if touched, and the Omnipod 5 C

Source: FDA device classification, 510(k)/PMA, and recall datasets. Recall entries count distinct FDA recall numbers, so one recall event affecting several products appears as several entries. Browse every product code SPEQ tracks →