FDA PRODUCT CODE · CLASS II

MYN — Analyzer, Medical Image

For information on the MYN device, please see: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/22/2020-00494/radiology-devices-reclassification-of-medical-image-analyzers

What these counts are not

Clearance and recall counts are SPEQ’s aggregation of FDA’s own published records for the code. A recall count is a measure of history, not of a device’s safety, neither number is an FDA rating, and SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA.

DEVICE CLASS
Class II
REGULATION
21 CFR 892.2070
MEDICAL SPECIALTY
Radiology
REVIEW PANEL
RA
— Implant— Life-sustaining— GMP-exempt— Third-party review eligible
21
510(K)/PMA CLEARANCES
510k: 21
0
RECALL ENTRIES

What this classification requires

Every statement below is FDA’s own classification record for this product code, quoted from the device classification field reference. The SPEQ reading beneath each one is SPEQ’s interpretation of what it means for the work, and is not FDA text.

PREMARKET PATHWAY

510(K)

SPEQ READINGA premarket notification under 21 CFR Part 807 Subpart E is the route for this code. The submission argues substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate, so the engineering question is which predicate the design can actually be compared against, and the evidence question is what testing supports that comparison.

DEVICE CLASS

Class II (moderate to high risk): general controls and special controls

SPEQ READINGSpecial controls are the distinguishing feature: performance standards, guidance documents, patient registries or postmarket surveillance named for the device type. Find the special controls before designing the test plan — they usually name the tests.

MALFUNCTION REPORTING

Device is eligible for The Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program

SPEQ READINGMalfunctions for this code may be reported in periodic summary form rather than as individual MDRs under 21 CFR Part 803. Eligibility is a property of the product code; using it is a decision the manufacturer makes and must be able to justify.

GMP / QUALITY SYSTEM

Not exempt due to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)/Quality System

SPEQ READINGThe full Quality Management System Regulation (21 CFR 820, incorporating ISO 13485:2016) applies, and is what an FDA inspection of this device will be conducted against.

IMPLANT

Device is not implantable

SPEQ READINGNo implant-specific expectations attach from the classification itself.

LIFE-SUSTAINING

Device is not used for life sustaining purposes

SPEQ READINGNo life-sustaining designation attaches to this code.

THIRD-PARTY REVIEW

Device is not a candidate for a third party review program

SPEQ READINGFDA reviews any premarket notification for this code directly.

21 CFR 892.2070 — Medical image analyzer

The classification regulation for this product code, as published by the Office of the Federal Register. This is the regulation text itself — no SPEQ interpretation appears in it.

(a) Identification. Medical image analyzers, including computer-assisted/aided detection (CADe) devices for mammography breast cancer, ultrasound breast lesions, radiograph lung nodules, and radiograph dental caries detection, is a prescription device that is intended to identify, mark, highlight, or in any other manner direct the clinicians' attention to portions of a radiology image that may reveal abnormalities during interpretation of patient radiology images by the clinicians. This device incorporates pattern recognition and data analysis capabilities and operates on previously acquired medical images. This device is not intended to replace the review by a qualified radiologist, and is not intended to be used for triage, or to recommend diagnosis.

(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: (1) Design verification and validation must include: (i) A detailed description of the image analysis algorithms including a description of the algorithm inputs and outputs, each major component or block, and algorithm limitations.

(ii) A detailed description of pre-specified performance testing methods and dataset(s) used to assess whether the device will improve reader performance as intended and to characterize the standalone device performance. Performance testing includes one or more standalone tests, side-by-side comparisons, or a reader study, as applicable.

(iii) Results from performance testing that demonstrate that the device improves reader performance in the intended use population when used in accordance with the instructions for use. The performance assessment must be based on appropriate diagnostic accuracy measures ( e.g., receiver operator characteristic plot, sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and diagnostic likelihood ratio). The test dataset must contain a sufficient number of cases from important cohorts ( e.g., subsets defined by clinically relevant confounders, effect modifiers, concomitant diseases, and subsets defined by image acquisition characteristics) such that the performance estimates and confidence intervals of the device for these individual subsets can be characterized for the intended use population and imaging equipment.

(iv) Appropriate software documentation ( e.g., device hazard analysis; software requirements specification document; software design specification document; traceability analysis; description of verification and validation activities including system level test protocol, pass/fail criteria, and results; and cybersecurity).

(2) Labeling must include the following: (i) A detailed description of the patient population for which the device is indicated for use.

(ii) A detailed description of the intended reading protocol.

(iii) A detailed description of the intended user and user training that addresses appropriate reading protocols for the device.

(iv) A detailed description of the device inputs and outputs.

(v) A detailed description of compatible imaging hardware and imaging protocols.

(vi) Discussion of warnings, precautions, and limitations must include situations in which the device may fail or may not operate at its expected performance level ( e.g., poor image quality or for certain subpopulations), as applicable.

(vii) Device operating instructions.

(viii) A detailed summary of the performance testing, including: test methods, dataset characteristics, results, and a summary of sub-analyses on case distributions stratified by relevant confounders, such as lesion and organ characteristics, disease stages, and imaging equipment. [85 FR 3548, Jan. 22, 2020]

Source: Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. 21 CFR is a work of the United States Government and is in the public domain. SPEQ read this section on October 22, 2026. CFR is amended continuously, so verify against the source before acting on it: read 21 CFR 892.2070 on eCFR →

Recent clearances

K252486Gleamer · 510k2026-09-09
K261059Overjet, Inc. · 510k2026-08-06
K260851Better Diagnostics AI Corp. · 510k2026-07-15
K252953Velmeni, Inc. · 510k2026-05-11
K251934Qure.Ai Technologies · 510k2026-01-16
K252934DGNCT, LLC · 510k2026-01-15
K253009Dentsply Sirona, Inc. · 510k2026-01-07
K252086Nobel Biocare C/O Medicim NV · 510k2025-11-17

Source: FDA device classification, 510(k)/PMA, and recall datasets. Recall entries count distinct FDA recall numbers, so one recall event affecting several products appears as several entries. Browse every product code SPEQ tracks →