FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #560 OF 1,932 MOST-CITED
Plant Maintenance
FDA cited this observation 44 times across 39 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.
What this grouping is not
An observation-type page groups FDA’s published citation records. The grouping, the compliance steps and the root causes are SPEQ synthesis, not an FDA classification of any citation, and a count measures what FDA published rather than risk.
What this observation is associated with
Firms cited for this observation also appear in FDA compliance actions — warning letters, injunctions, or seizures — at 3.3× the rate of the average FDA-cited firm (25.6% vs 7.8%), across 39 FEI-matched firms.
This is an association, not causation, and reflects co-occurrence in FDA's records — not a claim that the observation caused or preceded the action.
How FDA worded it — real examples
You did not maintain your plant in good repair to prevent animal food from becoming adulterated.
You did not maintain your plant in good repair to prevent animal food from becoming adulterated.
You did not maintain your plant in a clean manner to prevent animal food from becoming adulterated.
You did not maintain your plant in good repair to prevent animal food from becoming adulterated.
You did not maintain your plant in a clean manner and in good repair to prevent animal food from becoming adulterated.
You did not maintain your plant in a clean manner to prevent animal food from becoming adulterated.
Related SPEQ references
Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.
Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. Open the 483 observation explorer →