← 483 OBSERVATION EXPLORER

FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #118 OF 1,000 MOST-CITED

Individual Report of Malfunction

FDA cited this observation 192 times across 174 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.

BY PROGRAM AREA
Devices192
BY FISCAL YEAR
FY202612
FY202521
FY202429
FY202332
FY202219
FY20213
FY202013
FY201921
FY201826
FY201716

What this observation is associated with

Firms cited for this observation also appear in FDA compliance actions — warning letters, injunctions, or seizures — at 2.4× the rate of the average FDA-cited firm (20.1% vs 8.3%), across 174 FEI-matched firms.

This is an association, not causation, and reflects co-occurrence in FDA's records — not a claim that the observation caused or preceded the action.

CHECKING ACCESS

Checking your Professional access…

How FDA worded it — real examples

An MDR report was not submitted within 30 days of receiving or otherwise becoming aware of information that reasonably suggests that a marketed device has malfunctioned and would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.

Biowave Corporation · Westport, Connecticut · Devices · 2026-05-26

An MDR report was not submitted within 30 days of receiving or otherwise becoming aware of information that reasonably suggests that a marketed device has malfunctioned and would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.

Fudakang Industrial Co Ltd · Dongguan · Devices · 2026-03-12

An MDR report was not submitted within 30 days of receiving or otherwise becoming aware of information that reasonably suggests that a marketed device has malfunctioned and would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.

Fehling Instruments GmbH & Co. KG · Karlstein A. Main · Devices · 2026-03-12

An MDR report was not submitted within 30 days of receiving or otherwise becoming aware of information that reasonably suggests that a marketed device has malfunctioned and would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.

ZIIP INC · Pleasant Hill, California · Devices · 2026-01-12

An MDR report was not submitted within 30 days of receiving or otherwise becoming aware of information that reasonably suggests that a marketed device has malfunctioned and would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.

ZIOSOFT, INC. · Minato · Devices · 2025-12-18

An MDR report was not submitted within 30 days of receiving or otherwise becoming aware of information that reasonably suggests that a marketed device has malfunctioned and would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.

Pathright Medical Inc · Orem, Utah · Devices · 2025-11-17

Related SPEQ references

Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.

Medical devices

Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA; this is a reference view of public FDA data.

Weekly Briefing

Get the Weekly GxP Briefing

Curated regulatory intelligence — enforcement, recalls, guidance, and quality signals — in one practitioner-grade email each week. Free.

Read a past issue →