FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #105 OF 1,923 MOST-CITED

Complaints

FDA cited this observation 284 times across 267 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.

What this grouping is not

An observation-type page groups FDA’s published citation records. The grouping, the compliance steps and the root causes are SPEQ synthesis, not an FDA classification of any citation, and a count measures what FDA published rather than risk.

BY PROGRAM AREA
Devices284
BY FISCAL YEAR
FY20264
FY202530
FY202435
FY202320
FY202219
FY20217
FY202020
FY201930
FY201833
FY201746
FY201640

What this observation means, and how to comply

SPEQ's practitioner reading of this finding. The regulatory basis is a cited fact; the interpretation, compliance steps, and root causes are SPEQ synthesis — not an FDA classification of the citation.

21 CFR 111.560 (dietary supplements)

A dietary-supplement manufacturer did not adequately review and investigate product complaints — the reports from consumers or others that may indicate the product does not meet its specifications or is otherwise associated with a problem.

Why FDA writes it — Complaints are the manufacturer’s early-warning signal for product problems in the field. Failing to review and investigate them means real defects and safety signals go undetected and uncorrected, so the same problem recurs and reaches more consumers.

HOW TO COMPLY
  • Establish and follow procedures for the review and investigation of product complaints.
  • Have a qualified person review each complaint to determine whether it involves a possible failure to meet specifications or other CGMP requirements.
  • Investigate complaints that involve a possible failure, and extend the investigation where warranted.
  • Document the complaint, review, investigation, and any corrective action.
WHY FIRMS GET CITED
  • Complaints handled ad hoc, so signals and trends are missed.
  • No investigation of complaints that indicate a possible specification failure.
PROFESSIONAL · REMEDIATION PLAYBOOK · SPEQ SYNTHESIS

How to close this finding — and stop it recurring

CHECKING ACCESS

Checking your Professional access…

What this observation is associated with

Firms cited for this observation also appear in FDA compliance actions — warning letters, injunctions, or seizures — at 0.9× the rate of the average FDA-cited firm (6.7% vs 7.8%), across 267 FEI-matched firms.

This is an association, not causation, and reflects co-occurrence in FDA's records — not a claim that the observation caused or preceded the action.

CHECKING ACCESS

Checking your Professional access…

How FDA worded it — real examples

Complaint files are not adequately maintained.

Jedmed Instrument Company · Saint Louis, Missouri · Devices · 2025-12-05

Complaint files are not adequately maintained.

Blephex, LLC · Brentwood, Tennessee · Devices · 2025-11-19

Complaint files are not adequately maintained.

APEX (GUANGZHOU) TOOLS & ORTHOPEDICS COMPANY · Guangzhou · Devices · 2025-10-30

Complaint files are not maintained.

SPOT HEALTH INC · Cincinnati, Ohio · Devices · 2025-10-22

Complaint files are not adequately maintained.

Syntech International, Inc · Irvine, California · Devices · 2025-09-19

Complaint files are not adequately maintained.

BCM Co., Ltd. · Goyang · Devices · 2025-09-18

Related SPEQ references

Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.

Quality risk management →Medical devices →

Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. Open the 483 observation explorer →