FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #155 OF 1,000 MOST-CITED
Drip and condensate
FDA cited this observation 196 times across 193 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.
What this observation is associated with
Firms cited for this observation also appear in FDA compliance actions — warning letters, injunctions, or seizures — at 1.3× the rate of the average FDA-cited firm (10.4% vs 7.7%), across 193 FEI-matched firms.
This is an association, not causation, and reflects co-occurrence in FDA's records — not a claim that the observation caused or preceded the action.
How FDA worded it — real examples
The plant is not constructed in such a manner as to prevent drip and condensate from contaminating food-contact surfaces.
The plant is not constructed in such a manner as to prevent drip and condensate from contaminating food, food-contact surfaces and food-packaging materials.
The plant is not constructed in such a manner as to prevent drip from contaminating food-packaging materials.
The plant is not constructed in such a manner as to prevent drip and condensate from contaminating food, food-contact surfaces and food-packaging materials.
The plant is not constructed in such a manner as to prevent drip and condensate from contaminating food and food-packaging materials.
The plant is not constructed in such a manner as to prevent condensate from contaminating food and food-contact surfaces.
Related SPEQ references
Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.
Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA; this is a reference view of public FDA data.
Get the Weekly GxP Briefing
Curated regulatory intelligence — enforcement, recalls, guidance, and quality signals — in one practitioner-grade email each week. Free.