← 483 OBSERVATION EXPLORER

FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #713 OF 1,000 MOST-CITED

Process Controls Monitoring Frequency

FDA cited this observation 23 times across 23 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.

BY PROGRAM AREA
Foods23
BY FISCAL YEAR
FY20221
FY20211
FY20206
FY20199
FY20186

How FDA worded it — real examples

Your process controls monitoring frequency was not adequate.

Jagger Cone Company, Inc. · Stryker, Ohio · Foods · 2021-10-06

Your process controls monitoring frequency was not adequate.

Excalibur Seasoning Company Ltd. · Pekin, Illinois · Foods · 2021-08-10

Your process controls monitoring frequency was not adequate.

Doehler North America, Inc. · Cartersville, Georgia · Foods · 2020-03-06

Your process controls monitoring frequency was not adequate.

AbiMar Foods, Inc · Abilene, Texas · Foods · 2020-02-29

Your process controls monitoring frequency was not adequate.

Anita's Snack Foods Corporation · Kingsport, Tennessee · Foods · 2019-11-19

Your process controls monitoring frequency was not adequate.

Novus Foods · Riviera Beach, Florida · Foods · 2019-11-15

Related SPEQ references

Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.

Food industry

Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA; this is a reference view of public FDA data.

Weekly Briefing

Get the Weekly GxP Briefing

Curated regulatory intelligence — enforcement, recalls, guidance, and quality signals — in one practitioner-grade email each week. Free.

Read a past issue →