← 483 OBSERVATION EXPLORER

FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #781 OF 1,000 MOST-CITED

Physical plant - screening against pests

FDA cited this observation 20 times across 18 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.

BY PROGRAM AREA
Foods20
BY FISCAL YEAR
FY20254
FY20242
FY20212
FY20193
FY20184
FY20175

How FDA worded it — real examples

Your physical plant did not use adequate screening or other protection against pests.

GAYATRI AYUPHARMA PVT LTD · Chandial · Foods · 2025-06-24

Your physical plant did not use adequate screening or other protection against pests.

Vitromed Healthcare · Jaipur · Foods · 2025-03-05

Your physical plant did not use adequate screening or other protection against pests.

PM-International Logistics Center America, LLC · Bradenton, Florida · Foods · 2025-02-20

Your physical plant did not use adequate screening or other protection against pests.

Rocky Mountain Nutrition, LLC · Mansfield, Texas · Foods · 2024-12-12

Your physical plant did not use adequate screening or other protection against pests.

Best Nutrition Products, Inc. · Union City, California · Foods · 2024-08-28

Your physical plant did not use adequate screening or other protection against pests.

HNCO ORGANICS PVT LTD · Paldi Kankaj · Foods · 2023-12-14

Related SPEQ references

Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.

Contamination controlFood industry

Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA; this is a reference view of public FDA data.

Weekly Briefing

Get the Weekly GxP Briefing

Curated regulatory intelligence — enforcement, recalls, guidance, and quality signals — in one practitioner-grade email each week. Free.

Read a past issue →