← 483 OBSERVATION EXPLORER

FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #921 OF 1,000 MOST-CITED

Critical factors not stated

FDA cited this observation 19 times across 19 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.

BY PROGRAM AREA
Foods19
BY FISCAL YEAR
FY20252
FY20241
FY20231
FY20221
FY20201
FY20191
FY20181
FY20177
FY20164

How FDA worded it — real examples

A critical factor that may affect the scheduled process was not specified in the scheduled process.

Gruppo Fini · Ravarino · Foods · 2025-09-11

A critical factor that may affect the scheduled process was not specified in the scheduled process.

Trivelli Tartufi, Srl · Roccafluvione · Foods · 2024-12-10

A critical factor that may affect the scheduled process was not specified in the scheduled process.

Dairyfood USA, Inc. · Blue Mounds, Wisconsin · Foods · 2023-12-28

A critical factor that may affect the scheduled process was not specified in the scheduled process.

Grupo de Hongo Zeta Endotzi SPR de RL · Jiquipilco · Foods · 2023-02-02

A critical factor that may affect the scheduled process was not specified in the scheduled process.

AUSTIN FOODS & BEVERAGES PVT LTD · Agas · Foods · 2022-05-24

A critical factor that may affect the scheduled process was not specified in the scheduled process.

Seko Sp. z o.o. · Chojnice · Foods · 2020-01-28

Related SPEQ references

Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.

Food industry

Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA; this is a reference view of public FDA data.

Weekly Briefing

Get the Weekly GxP Briefing

Curated regulatory intelligence — enforcement, recalls, guidance, and quality signals — in one practitioner-grade email each week. Free.

Read a past issue →