← 483 OBSERVATION EXPLORER

FDA 483 OBSERVATION · #738 OF 1,000 MOST-CITED

Equipment - design - appropriate and suitable

FDA cited this observation 22 times across 22 firms in recent inspections. Below: how it breaks down by program area and fiscal year, and real examples of how FDA worded it on Form FDA 483.

BY PROGRAM AREA
Foods22
BY FISCAL YEAR
FY20267
FY202513
FY20242

How FDA worded it — real examples

You did not use equipment or utensils of appropriate design and suitable for its intended use.

T. E. Neesby Inc · Friant, California · Foods · 2026-05-21

You did not use equipment or utensils of appropriate construction and that are properly maintained.

Herbalife International of America, Inc · Winston Salem, North Carolina · Foods · 2026-04-24

You did not use equipment or utensils suitable for its intended use.

Neurogan, Inc. · San Diego, California · Foods · 2026-04-17

You did not use equipment or utensils that are properly maintained.

Feral Fungi LLC · Estacada, Oregon · Foods · 2026-04-15

You did not use equipment or utensils that are properly maintained.

Global Products Group, LLC · Bradenton, Florida · Foods · 2026-03-25

You did not use equipment or utensils of appropriate workmanship and that are properly maintained.

Meta Labs Pharmaceuticals, LLC · Roswell, Georgia · Foods · 2025-12-18

Related SPEQ references

Where to read the requirements behind this observation area on SPEQ. These are SPEQ's topic and audience pages — not an FDA classification of the citation.

Food industry

Examples are a representative sample of FDA's published inspection observations. SPEQ is not affiliated with the FDA; this is a reference view of public FDA data.

Weekly Briefing

Get the Weekly GxP Briefing

Curated regulatory intelligence — enforcement, recalls, guidance, and quality signals — in one practitioner-grade email each week. Free.

Read a past issue →